First published in 1984, The Politics and Ethics of Evaluation considers, from the vantage point of the authors’ considerable experience of a wide range of evaluation, the ways in which they, and others, have coped with ethical and political problems that inherently arise during the evaluation process, particularly that of the responsive or democratic type. It looks at the evaluator’s claim to independence and how this is qualified by his relationship to his subject and to various other audiences.
The ethical and political problems of evaluation are discussed from the different perspectives of moral philosophy, sociology, the politics of organisations, curriculum development, and institutional evaluation. Also included is a chapter detailing English law and legal judgements pertaining to qualified privilege, libel and defamation of character. Guidelines for conducting independent evaluation conclude the volume. This book will be of interest to students and researchers of higher education, curriculum studies and ethics.
Introduction: the Ethics of Evaluation
Clem Adelman
1. Confidentiality and the Right to Know
Richard Pring
2. Methodology and Ethics
John Elliott
3. Handling Value Issues
Michael Eraut
4. Understudy – Evaluator Seeks Authors
Clem Adelman
5. Negotiating Conditions for Independent Evaluators
Helen Simons
6. Evaluation: A Case of Research in Chains
Ian Jamieson
7. Evaluating Curriculum Evaluation
Lawrence Stenhouse
Guidelines I: Principles and Procedures for the Conduct of an Independent Evaluation
Helen Simons
Guidelines II: What Can be Said; What Must be Said
Ann McAllister
Biography
Clem Adelman, at the time of this publication, was a Research Co-ordinator at Bulmershe College of Higher Education, Reading, UK.
